Critical appraisal is the process of carefully and systematically examining research to judge its trustworthiness, and its value and relevance in a particular context (Burls, 2009). Critical appraisal of studies involves checking the quality, reliability and relevance of the studies you've selected to help answer your review question. Depending on the type of study you are evaluating you may use different evaluation tools. When evaluating studies, some questions to consider are:
(UIC Library, 2023)
References
Burls, A. (2009). What is critical appraisal? Retrieved April 21, 2022, from www.whatisseries.co.uk
See chapters Finding the Evidence and Why Study Results Mislead
Burls, A. (2009). What is critical appraisal? Retrieved April 21, 2022, from www.whatisseries.co.uk
The articles below provide a step-by-step appraisal on how to critique quantitative and qualitative research articles:
Ryan, F., Coughlan, M. & Cronin, P. (2007). Step-by-step guide to critiquing research. Part 2: qualitative research. British Journal of Nursing, 16(2), 738-744.
Tod, D., Booth, A., & Smith, B. (2021). Critical appraisal. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2021.1952471 This article helps to define critical appraisal, identify its benefits, discuss conceptual issues influencing the adequacy of a critical appraisal, and detail procedures to help reviewers undertake critical appraisals.
Buccheri, R. K., & Sharifi, C. (2017). Critical Appraisal Tools and Reporting Guidelines for Evidence‐Based Practice. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 14(6), 463–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12258 The primary purpose of this paper is to help nurses understand the difference between critical appraisal tools and reporting guidelines.