Examples with Medline
Type of Question |
Type of Study/Methodology |
MEDLINE Filters |
Therapy: information needed about treatments (effectiveness, cost, etc.) |
Double-Blind |
Randomized Controlled Trial [PT] |
Diagnosis: information needed about a diagnostic test (sensitivity, accuracy, etc.) |
Controlled Trial |
Sensitivity and Specificity [MH] |
Prognosis: information needed about the course of the disease over time, expected complications, etc. |
Cohort Studies |
Cohort Studies [MH] |
Etiology/Harm: information needed about causes of disease or contributing factors of disease |
Cohort Studies |
Cohort Studies [MH] |
Prevention: information needed about the prevention of disease (immunization, social factors, etc.) |
Randomized Controlled Trial |
Randomized Controlled Trial [PT] |
Quality Improvement: information needed about clients' and health professionals' experiences and concerns |
Randomized Controlled Trial |
Randomized Controlled Trial [PT] |
(Abbreviations: MH=Medical Subject Heading; PT=Publication Type; SH=Subheading; TW=Text Word)
This secondary literature synthesizes, filters, and evaluates the primary research literature. Dissemination and incorporation of valid clinical research findings into medical practice is the ultimate goal. Examples with Cochrane, PubMed, Medline
Filtered or |
Description/Definition |
How To Find This Type of Information |
|
SYSTEMATIC |
-differ from traditional review articles in that conclusions are evidence-based rather than commentary -start with a clearly articulated question -use explicit, rigorous methods to identify, critically appraise, and synthesize relevant studies -appraise relevant published and unpublished evidence before combining and analyzing data -include description of how primary data sources are identified -assess individual studies for validity |
*In MEDLINE: *In PubMed: Clinical Queries "Systematic Review" is available as a limit option. |
|
META-ANALYSES |
-specific methodologic and statistical technique for combining quantitative data -type of systematic overview |
*Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews *In MEDLINE: |
|
EVIDENCE-BASED |
-gather, appraise, combine evidence systematically -include statements designed to assist practitioner and patient decisions -developed by professional groups, government agencies, local practices -include a structured abstract: objective, option, outcomes, evidence, values, benefits/harms/costs, recommendation, validation, sponsors |
*National Guideline Clearinghouse *Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality *US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations |
|
CRITICALLY |
-scan literature for clinically relevant studies -critically appraise the studies -provide commentary on strength of study and clinical significance -provided in a one-page format |
*Critically Appraised Worksheet and Guidelines *CATmaker software from CEBM |
|
DECISION |
-studies that analyze decisions faced by clinicians for an individual patient, about clinical policy, or a global health care policy -application of explicit, quantitative methods to analyze decisions under conditions of uncertainty -risks and benefits of a decision are made fully explicit -decision tree is included |
*In MEDLINE: Decision Support Techniques [MH] Cost-Benefit Analysis [MH] decision analysis [TI] |